I was very pleased with the pick. By all accounts, it was down to Frazier and Colin Moran. Between those two, I heavily favored Frazier. Moran possesses arguably the most polished bat in the draft. His ability to hit for average is far better than Frazier's at this time, and probably always will be. What turns me off to Moran is that his hit tool is really his only standout tool. He doesn't hit for big power, he's not terribly athletic, he has awful speed, and his defense at 3B is questionable at best. I don't care how good your hit tool is; I want more than one excellent tool for the #5 overall pick.Zephyrs wrote:Are there any thoughts on Cleveland's 1st round pick? Everything I have read on Clint Frazier sounds great. I have read that he has insane bat speed and tremendous raw power.
By contrast, Frazier has the potential to boast five above average to outstanding tools. Most exciting is his light tower power; he supposedly hit 16 of 24 balls for home runs at a private tryout for one team. That's no fluke; the guy has Popeye-like arms and he can mash. The concern is that he has pretty much maxed out on size and thus isn't terribly projectable, but what's there right now is plenty good for me. I like that he brings speed and athleticism to the table. He may even be capable of playing center field, though it's more likely he'll end up in right (where his power will play).
When you're drafting as high as #5, I think you need to be willing to take a risk on star-level potential. Moran was the safer bet. He almost certainly will be a regular contributor to the Miami Marlins, who tapped him with the #6 pick. Frazier has a lower floor than Moran. He might never harness his talents or develop his hit tool, which is his weakest tool at the moment. But kudos to the Indians for gambling on Frazier's star potential. These are the kinds of worthy, calculated gambles a franchise must take if it wishes to achieve greatness.