Page 1 of 2

Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 9:57 pm
by Evas

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:09 pm
by Borealis
Interesting deal - Bears taking on that lengthy Hawkins deal... is it me, or does nobody deal IC guys more than the Eva's?

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:14 pm
by Evas
Borealis wrote:Interesting deal - Bears taking on that lengthy Hawkins deal... is it me, or does nobody deal IC guys more than the Eva's?
IC guys are a great options for a lot of deals - often they have nice talent, but are high risk and further away from PEBA than most prospects.

For me, they are so far away from PEBA that I have a much easier time letting them go.

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:59 pm
by Sandgnats
Borealis wrote:Interesting deal - Bears taking on that lengthy Hawkins deal... is it me, or does nobody deal IC guys more than the Eva's?
Fascinating indeed Mike.

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:28 pm
by Ghosts
Evas wrote:SS receives:
LF Gilbert Murray
RF Jorge Lopez

BAK receives:
RF Benton Hawkins
RP Kyoichi Yoshimura
RP Sadakuno Nakagawa
2B Ahugena Harun (INT)
1B Cylde Stinton (INT)
C Conner Clavell (INT)
Everyone finds it very interesting & fascinating.... that must mean I didn't make a very good deal :shock:

In any case, we're excited about the prospects we're getting back and filling out our empty pen. Didn't want to take Hawkins back, but we'll see if he has some magic left in the tank.

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:29 pm
by Ghosts
Since I didn't say it in the first post... Bears agree.

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:42 pm
by Sandgnats
Bears wrote:Since I didn't say it in the first post... Bears agree.
Bobby is loading up on prospects. He's going to have a stacked system soon!

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:48 pm
by Evas
I really like Hawkins, but I can't afford to be patient with him in the stacked SL.

If Murray stays healthy, he should mash in SS. His glove is an upgrade too, so that helps.

I was a little hesitant to give up Nakagawa. I think he's poised for a big season.

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:49 pm
by Borealis
It's not any specific evaluation, but more the risk-reward that both teams take on with Murray and Hawkins... both have struggled with injuries, Hawkins seems to have been a bit better, statistically... I'd call it a 'change of scenery' deal - which I think Kevin kind of intimated... key for SS: if Murray flails, it's only a one year deal... Hawkins' deal is lengthy but not overly burdensome for the Bears budget -and even better if he continues to excel...

Like I said, interesting...

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:00 am
by Ghosts
Sandgnats wrote:
Bears wrote:Since I didn't say it in the first post... Bears agree.
Bobby is loading up on prospects. He's going to have a stacked system soon!
This is the plan. Only way I'm going to overtake the Aurora juggernaut. We made the playoffs this year and held a lead for half the season over them but weren't realistically close to a contender. We were kinda like whoever wins the AFC South this year :)

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:05 am
by Borealis
Bears wrote:We were kinda like whoever wins the AFC South this year :)
Just don't call us the NFC West...

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:51 am
by kiersteadmo
Borealis wrote:
Bears wrote:We were kinda like whoever wins the AFC South this year :)
Just don't call us the NFC West...
:lol: :lol:

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:22 pm
by Morris Ragland
Not processed. Maximum number of players allowed on one side of a trade is 5.

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 6:34 am
by Sandgnats
Don't we usually allow 1 per 5? So it can be broken into 2 deals for OOTP to process.

Re: Trade between SS and BAK

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:36 am
by Morris Ragland
No more than five players may be included by a team in a single trade.
I don't see any wiggle room there. The five player limit is baked into the the game and I don't see a way to change it. Could teams come to an agreement and break such a trade out into two parts? Certainly.