The exact formula behind the computation of the season score is a mystery. However, we've learned enough to know that about more than just wins and losses. Team finances absolutely factor in, for instance; a team with a low budget will get more score for their wins than one with a high budget. Talent level and owner expectations (were you expected to rebuild or contend) seem to factor in as well, as may awards won by players and your previous season's record.
That's all well and good... but how does your season score compare to the other teams in PEBA? Well, let's have a look, shall we?
NOTE: The number in parenthesis is the change from your '08 season score. The last two numbers are your '08 and '07 scores, respectively.
- ARL - 0 (-44) - 44 / 32
- AUR - 93 (+25) - 68 / 8
- BAK - 45 (-10) - 58 / 65
- CAN - 13 (-8) - 21 / 14
- CST - 63 (+30) - 33 / 56
- CON - 11 (+1) - 10 / 15
- CL - 65 (-10) - 75 / 63
- DUL - 9 (-5) - 15 / 26
- FAR - 22 (+7) - 15 / 7
- FLA - 26 (-1) - 27 / 18
- GLO - 30 (-16) - 46 / 22
- KAL - 34 (-3) - 37 / 53
- KEN - 13 (-3) - 16 / 12
- LON - 30 (+17) - 13 / 23
- MAN - 60 (+39) - 21 / 14
- NJ - 50 (-3) - 53 / 86
- NO - 71 (-2) - 73 / 61
- OMA - 16 (+3) - 13 / 31
- PS - 54 (+10) - 44 / 63
- REN - 20 (-5) - 25 / 20
- SA - 10 (-2) - 12 / 45
- TEM - 17 (+1) - 16 / 0
- WV - 0 (-35) - 35 / 4
- YUM - 6 (-1) - 7 / 17
So what does all this mean? Absolutely nothing! Season score has no bearing on anything whatsoever. The only thing to get out of it are bragging rights.
In addition to the scores, a couple status changes were announced at the conclusion of the season:
Connecticut: Market Size DROPS to "Average"
Crystal Lake: Fan Loyalty INCREASE to "Good" (CL's 2nd straight FL increase)