2019-21-22-25-26 Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

Message
Author
User avatar
Cole
All-Star
All-Star
Posts: 1726
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#31 Post by Cole »

Ocelots wrote: Kalamazoo qualifies for a market size increase.
Sweet! This making the playoffs thing isn't so bad after all? Bigger market and my team's budget went up by $8 million.. I'll have to keep up this success thing.
Cole
Kalamazoo Badgers GM
2016 - Present.
Post 838+
User avatar
Simon
Triple-A
Triple-A
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Poland

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#32 Post by Simon »

Umm, so i lost fan loyalty.. but im not listed as a team qualified for a hit.
Is it something that can happen regardless of Matt as well?
Simon Kuliszewski
Proud General Manager of San Antonio Calzones de Laredo
Since mid 2020 (268-293 .477)
User avatar
Coqui
All-Star
All-Star
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:13 pm

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#33 Post by Coqui »

Calzones wrote:Umm, so i lost fan loyalty.. but im not listed as a team qualified for a hit.
Is it something that can happen regardless of Matt as well?
Yes, from Matt's first post above:
Ocelots wrote:Keep in mind, OOTP generated changes are completely separate, and changes that occur within the game do not affect eligibility for performance based changes, and vice versa.
James
GM San Juan Coqui
User avatar
Matt
VIP
VIP
Posts: 6453
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:21 pm

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#34 Post by Matt »

The 2022 Performance Based changes have been determined, and all changes will be reflected after the next sim.

Tempe 17
RGV 17
Aurora 15
Kentucky 15
Duluth 14
Manchester 12
Crystal Lake 11
Arlington 11
Amsterdam 11
Yuma 11
Hartford 11
Florida 10
London 8
Okinawa 8
Dayton 8
Kalamazoo 8
Charleston 8
San Antonio 8
Shin Seki 7
Marseille 7
Lupin 6
Palm Springs 6
Canton 6
Niihama-shi 5
West Virginia 5
New Orleans 5
Neo Tokyo 4
Havana 4
Fargo 4
New Jersey 2
Reno 2
Bakersfield -1

Tempe 17
RGV 17
Aurora 15
Kentucky 15
Duluth 14
Manchester 12


Tempe qualifies for the Market Size increase. RGV was not eligible for an increase this year as they had averaged more than 100 losses the previous 3 seasons (123 losses will leave a mark).

Aurora and Duluth will receive Fan Loyalty increases. Kentucky is ineligible this season because they received an increase last season. Manchester remains ineligible because they received a change 3 yrs ago. Since Aurora's Fan Loyalty is already maxed out, no change will occur.

Neo Tokyo 4
Havana 4
Fargo 4
New Jersey 2
Reno 2
Bakersfield -1


Bakersfield is ineligible for the Market size change since they took a hit 3 years ago.

Reno, New Jersey and Fargo are also ineligible because of recent Fan Loyalty changes. That leaves Havana and Neo Tokyo suffering the only hits this season, -1 to Fan Loyalty.
User avatar
Apollos
All-Star
All-Star
Posts: 1784
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:16 am
Location: Virginia, DC Metro

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#35 Post by Apollos »

Good for Tempe! If any organization needed a financial lift, it's the Knights.

Aurora and Duluth on the other hand :shake:
Brian Hazelwood - GM, Tempe Knights
User avatar
Matt
VIP
VIP
Posts: 6453
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:21 pm

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#36 Post by Matt »

Sandgnats wrote:Good for Tempe! If any organization needed a financial lift, it's the Knights.

Aurora and Duluth on the other hand :shake:
Yeah, Aurora was already maxed out so it doesn't effect anything, but that Championship did inoculate them from taking any hits for a few years.
User avatar
Borealis
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8430
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:27 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#37 Post by Borealis »

Hmmmmmmm... How can our loyalty be maxed out, yet our Fan Interest goes during the course of a Championship season? Sounds like a communist plot... Maybe we can roll that FL into FI? :bang:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Michael Topham, President Golden Entertainment & President-CEO of the Aurora Borealis
Image
2019, 2021, 2022, 2023 PEBA Champions
User avatar
Matt
VIP
VIP
Posts: 6453
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:21 pm

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#38 Post by Matt »

Borealis wrote:Hmmmmmmm... How can our loyalty be maxed out, yet our Fan Interest goes during the course of a Championship season? Sounds like a communist plot... Maybe we can roll that FL into FI? :bang:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Fan Interest is even more fickle than Fan Loyalty. I never included Fan Interest in the system because it factors in too many day to day factors and goes up and down over the course of a season. I stuck with just Market Size and Fan Loyalty because those are things that change much more slowly. Fan Interest can also be gamed to an extent - for instance if the performance based adjustments were to give a team a Fan Interest penalty, they could just trade for an extremely popular player or sign one as a free agent, completely wiping out the performance based hit. Thus, no inclusion as part of the system.

Your not the first that missed out on an increase, however. I believe Amsterdam missed out a few years ago because of being maxed out. Them the breaks.
User avatar
Borealis
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8430
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:27 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#39 Post by Borealis »

No prob - I'll take maxed out...
Michael Topham, President Golden Entertainment & President-CEO of the Aurora Borealis
Image
2019, 2021, 2022, 2023 PEBA Champions
User avatar
roncollins
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2777
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#40 Post by roncollins »

Filed under: Problems of the 1%. :)
Ron Collins
GM - Toyama Wind Dancers
2020 Neo-Tokyo Cup Champions
_______________________________________________________________
User avatar
Akira
All-Star
All-Star
Posts: 1301
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:59 pm

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#41 Post by Akira »

Ocelots wrote:That leaves Havana and Neo Tokyo suffering the only hits this season, -1 to Fan Loyalty.
Ouchy.
RonHi
ronhi0@yahoo.com
Neo-Tokyo Akira
Trade Block updated on 2/12/2021
2012 Neo-Tokyo Cup Winner
2017 Neo-Tokyo Cup Winner
User avatar
Leones
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2579
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:42 pm

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#42 Post by Leones »

Havana's got bigger problems than the fickle love of a few yahoos in the stands. Our owner has completely lost his mind this year. It's going to be a very difficult season. !+)
Patrick Hildreth
- La leña roja tarde pero llega

Image
User avatar
Arroyos
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 3075
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:24 pm
Location: Oceanside, CA

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#43 Post by Arroyos »

Leones wrote: Our owner has completely lost his mind this year. It's going to be a very difficult season. !+)
At least your owner has a mind to lose. Yuma's collective ownership has not a single cell of gray matter among them. For example, they insisted we extend Javier Cruz' contract without providing any money for extensions. And their goals for the coming season include (1) "Win the Championship" and (2) "Build a team that can bring home a championship in the next four years."

Do they even talk to each other? Or proofread their messages to our poor bedraggled GM, Pam Postema?

Apparently, in order to buy a ball club, or a share in a club as in Yuma's case, you must pony up your grey cells.
Bob Mayberry
Yuma Arroyos
joined 1 April 2010
User avatar
Simon
Triple-A
Triple-A
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Poland

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#44 Post by Simon »

Haha :lol:
Simon Kuliszewski
Proud General Manager of San Antonio Calzones de Laredo
Since mid 2020 (268-293 .477)
User avatar
Borealis
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8430
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:27 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Changes (PEBA)

#45 Post by Borealis »

Cliff Hangers wrote:Filed under: Problems of the 1%. :)
To quote the RL Will T - "First World Problems"...
Bulldozers wrote: At least your owner has a mind to lose. Yuma's collective ownership has not a single cell of gray matter among them. For example, they insisted we extend Javier Cruz' contract without providing any money for extensions. And their goals for the coming season include (1) "Win the Championship" and (2) "Build a team that can bring home a championship in the next four years." Do they even talk to each other? Or proofread their messages to our poor bedraggled GM, Pam Postema? Apparently, in order to buy a ball club, or a share in a club as in Yuma's case, you must pony up your grey cells.
Right? We were ordered to sign 'Tugboat' to an extension when he had two years left, and we're demanded to build a dynasty in four years? Has the guy checked his fingers? That's what you get, I guess, when the silent, unknown child takes over when the old man kicks the bucket...
Michael Topham, President Golden Entertainment & President-CEO of the Aurora Borealis
Image
2019, 2021, 2022, 2023 PEBA Champions
Post Reply

Return to “Performance Based Market/Fan Loyalty Adjustments Archive”